Okay, so, like, ignoring fourth-party risk? Seriously, thats just asking for trouble, ya know? Its a mistake, a costly mistake, if you ask me. I mean, everyones worried about their own suppliers (third-party risk, right?) and making sure theyre secure. check But what about their suppliers?
Ignoring 4th Party Risk: A Costly Mistake - check
- check
- check
- check
- check
- check

Think about it this way: your company uses some fancy software, right? And that software company, they use a cloud provider for storage. And that cloud provider, well, they rely on a data center run by someone else. See how deep it goes?
Ignoring 4th Party Risk: A Costly Mistake - managed service new york
- managed services new york city
- check
- managed services new york city
- check
- managed services new york city
- check
- managed services new york city
- check
- managed services new york city
- check


If that data center gets hacked, or has some kinda, you know, outage, boom!
Ignoring 4th Party Risk: A Costly Mistake - managed it security services provider
- managed services new york city
- managed services new york city
- managed services new york city
- managed services new york city
- managed services new york city
- managed services new york city
- managed services new york city
And its not just about security breaches. It can be about compliance, too. What if one of your fourth parties is doing something shady with data privacy that violates regulations? Youre still on the hook! You might not even know its happening, which makes it even worse.
I guess what Im saying is, you cant just assume that because your direct suppliers are locked down, youre safe. You gotta dig deeper, ask those uncomfortable questions, do your due diligence (even if its a pain).
Ignoring 4th Party Risk: A Costly Mistake - check
- managed service new york
- managed services new york city
- check
- managed service new york
- managed services new york city
- check
- managed service new york